Megan's AmCon Blog
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
More on Virtual Worlds
As we've talked more about virtual worlds and Second Life, which I mentioned 2 blogs ago, and continued reading Coming of Age in Second Life by Tom Boellstorff, governance of this particular virtual world has been discussed. The company who created Second Life is based in California and is called Linden Lab. This corporation has ultimate control of everything in the virtual world and anything said or done in Second Life is recorded by the companies' many servers. The author mentions that everyone signs a Terms of Service agreement when initially creating an account and has no ability to negotiate these terms with Linden. Nor do users get any say in the rules and laws of the virtual world (however they can form groups and stage protests with their avatars). The author writes, "Since SL was owned by Linden Lab, its authority was absolute...such total control over virtual worlds is one of the most consequential aspects of emerging models of governance for them, raising the prospect of virtual dictatorships...This omnipotence with regard to SL's governance was a source of concern to many residents. Those accused of transgressions had no way to face their accusers or a appeal a decision" (223). This was really interesting to me after spending a semester on democracy in AmCon. In this virtual world you can do so many things you can't do in real life. You can fly, embody any animal, look any way you want, talk anyway you want, build anything you want, yet you have absolutely no rights as a user when it comes to governance and the rules set in place by the company who owns the virtual world. Part of the emphasis of using virtual worlds is having the ability to do so many otherwise impossible things, yet you can't stand up for yourself if you are accused of doing something you didn't do. This is such a different state than what we have in the US as a democracy. In Second Life, you can do anything except have a voice or say.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Black Elk Speaks
I guess I don't have that much to say yet about the content of the first 6 chapters of Black Elk Speaks, but it was nice to read something written in a story form for a change. I really like how Neihardt write Black Elk Speaks: ...and tells Black Elk's stories as he would tell them and then says Standing Bear or whoever else speaks: ...as if you're sitting there with them, listening to these men talk and add on to each other's memories. I think the other perspectives that the older men give add a lot to Black Elk's story and provide context and knowledge about things that Black Elk may not have been old enough to understand or observe.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Social Capital in a Virtual World
In my anthropology class, we recently starting reading an ethnography about Second Life, a virtual world where people can get online and do practically anything with an avatar such as go shopping, build a house, attend a wedding, etc. (For more info- http://secondlife.com/whatis/). Users say that the most compelling reason they use Second Life is the relationships they make with people who are across the globe. Even if people have never met each other in the actual world, in Second Life, they can get married, be friends; an adult can even be a child avatar and have another user agree to be their parent in Second Life. This ability to create relationships and participate in groups in this world made me think about Putnam and social capital. Could people produce social capital in a virtual world like many of our groups decided in Part II that people can do on Facebook? This virtual world is like Facebook but better because you can interact with each other through more than just words. For instance, this picture is of a GreenPeace meeting in Second Life. It sounds like a stretch, and the concept is somewhat confusing, but I wonder what Putnam would say to this kind of interaction and connectivity between not only Americans, but the global population.
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
On Civil Disobedience
"Cast your whole vote, not a strip of paper merely, but your whole influence. A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority; it is not even a minority then; but it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight." -Thoreau in "On Civil Disobedience"
I like this quote by Thoreau, how he says not to just fill in a circle at the polls and walk away from this democratic process, but to cast "your whole influence." I think he means that we should try to see democracy not just as a one time action, but as an ongoing mindset or lifestyle. He wants people to use all the tools and resources of power they have to work towards what they want to see happen. Along with this, he also points out the dangers the majority can pose with how much power it is given in American democracy. He echoes much of what Tocqueville says as well. I feel like Thoreau, however, looks more at the negative aspects of this while Tocqueville talked more about how the minority can work to combat the majority through voluntary associations. Thoreau also says "There are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them; who, esteeming themselves children of Washington and Franklin, sit down with their hands in their pockets, and say that they know not what to do, and do nothing; who even postpone the question of freedom..." He points out how so many people are idle and don't do anything to change what they don't like while Tocqueville talks about how people, through voluntary associations, do not sit idle and work towards change.
I like this quote by Thoreau, how he says not to just fill in a circle at the polls and walk away from this democratic process, but to cast "your whole influence." I think he means that we should try to see democracy not just as a one time action, but as an ongoing mindset or lifestyle. He wants people to use all the tools and resources of power they have to work towards what they want to see happen. Along with this, he also points out the dangers the majority can pose with how much power it is given in American democracy. He echoes much of what Tocqueville says as well. I feel like Thoreau, however, looks more at the negative aspects of this while Tocqueville talked more about how the minority can work to combat the majority through voluntary associations. Thoreau also says "There are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them; who, esteeming themselves children of Washington and Franklin, sit down with their hands in their pockets, and say that they know not what to do, and do nothing; who even postpone the question of freedom..." He points out how so many people are idle and don't do anything to change what they don't like while Tocqueville talks about how people, through voluntary associations, do not sit idle and work towards change.
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Thoreau's Walden
"The morning, which is the most memorable season of the day, is the awakening hour. Then there is least somnolence in us; and for an hour, at least, some part of us awakes which slumbers all the rest of the day and night...Every morning was a cheerful invitation to make my life of equal simplicity, and I may say innocence, with Nature herself...Morning brings back the heroic ages." -Thoreau in Walden
I liked what Thoreau says about morning. Like he says, I think there is something special about morning when it's quiet and the world is just how it is, without people or cars or anything we've contributed to it. This is kind of a simple blog post, but I think that if I were to take something from Thoreau's lessons that he wanted people to learn from and take into their lives, I would try to get up early more often or get up to see the sun rise and go be out in nature in the morning and experience the freshness and silence that's there. I think it'd be refreshing and a good way to remind myself of the peacefulness of life in the midst of all the busyness and rushing we're constantly a part of.
I liked what Thoreau says about morning. Like he says, I think there is something special about morning when it's quiet and the world is just how it is, without people or cars or anything we've contributed to it. This is kind of a simple blog post, but I think that if I were to take something from Thoreau's lessons that he wanted people to learn from and take into their lives, I would try to get up early more often or get up to see the sun rise and go be out in nature in the morning and experience the freshness and silence that's there. I think it'd be refreshing and a good way to remind myself of the peacefulness of life in the midst of all the busyness and rushing we're constantly a part of.
Thursday, April 7, 2011
Emerson's "Nature"
"To speak truly, few adult persons can see nature. Most persons do not see the sun. At least they have a very superficial seeing. The sun illuminates only the eye of the man, but shines into the eye and the heart of the child. The lover of nature is he whose inward and outward senses are still truly adjusted to each other; who has retained the spirit of infancy even into the era of manhood. His intercourse with heaven and earth, becomes part of his daily food." -from "Nature" by Ralph Waldo Emerson
This passage by Emerson and the general tone of "Nature" reminds me of Bellah's argument about paying attention. Emerson points out how as we get older and learn more, we forget about nature's presence and become less and less aware of it and its beauty, effects, etc. This contrasts greatly with when we're children and we amazed by every new discovery in the world around us. It's interesting because Bellah points out the "indifference of the youth to the world around them." Emerson believes adults are the ones who don't acknowledge nature's presence. This also reminds me of Thoreau's comparison of people to the railroad ties' nickname, "sleepers." He also saw people becoming less and less conscious of the world around them, especially the spiritual virtues in life. I think these men would greatly agree with each other if they were in conversation and Bellah could point out how young people seem less "awake" than the adults that Emerson believed were ignorant of the world they lived in .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)